What We Can Learn from Our Politicians To Improve Our Brand Communications

Posted by on Sep 26, 2013 in Blog | 0 comments

What We Can Learn from Our Politicians To Improve Our Brand Communications

No question, there are good reasons why the public has such a dismal view of our politicians in Congress today.  They can be dysfunctional, lack credibility, constantly bicker and stubbornly hold on to extreme positions, especially the Republican Tea Party.  But these same Republicans have mastered the use of words to describe their positions in a way that brand marketers can appreciate.

In the July 13 issue of the Economist, an article on “The War of the Word” provided excellent examples of the pithy expressions coined by Republicans, especially compared to the Democrats.  These tend to be short, simple and packed with emotional innuendoes – ideal traits for memorable brand names, slogans and taglines that marketers should aspire to with their communications.  For example, Obama struggled to explain the circumstances under which doctors might discuss end-of-life provisions of Medicare patients.   Meanwhile Sarah Palin undermined this, blithely claiming these were “Death Panels” and leveraging the unfounded implications to scare away voters

When arguing about abortion, Republicans favor a more evocative term, “life”, while Democrats refer to an abstract word, “choice”.  Under George W. Bush, we had the “Patriot” act, but Democrats created a mouthful to describe their new health act, “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act”.   No wonder the “Clean Air Act” remains the law of the land, whereas the “American Clean Energy and Security Act” of 2009 (the cap-and-trade bill) crashed to defeat.

The differences should be clear.   Great brands use succinct expressions loaded with powerful emotional connotations.  Words should describe something that can be visualized easily, even to the point where one can draw a picture of it.  Similarly smart branding starts with understanding the pain points and dreams of the customer, and ends with terminology and communications that consistently respond to these emotional needs.

The other practice used effectively by Republicans is sticking to a core, simplistic message repeatedly, until people are almost sick of hearing it again.  And that’s about when it starts to sink in.  This is also a worthwhile lesson for building brand equity.  The core brand positioning must be reinforced constantly using the same basic value proposition and all relevant touch points available.

People tend to vote with their hearts, even though some of these Republican promises are misguided and often create a perception that they are “weasels”.   Great brands also must appeal to the hearts of their customers, yet also be credible and prepared to deliver on their promises to be successful in the long run.

 
Image By: Bart RousseauCC BY 2.0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *